- 注册时间
- 2021-11-19
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 威望
- 星
- 金币
- 枚
- 贡献
- 分
- 经验
- 点
- 鲜花
- 朵
- 魅力
- 点
- 上传
- 次
- 下载
- 次
- 积分
- 8864
- 在线时间
- 小时
|
马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?欢迎注册
×
https://primes.utm.edu/notes/proofs/a_pseudoprimes.html
Let a > 1 be an integer. Recall that Fermat's (little) theorem shows that if p does not divide a, then ap-1 ≡ 1 (mod p). m is a probable-prime base a (an a-PRP) if am-1 ≡ 1 (mod m). "Most" such numbers m are prime, but if they are not, they are called pseudo-primes base a. The purpose of this note is to prove the following:
Theorem:
Let a be any integer greater than one. There is an infinite number of pseudoprimes with respect to the base a.
Proof: We will follow Ribenboim [HW79 p72].
Choose any prime p which does not divide a(a2-1) (this condition can be weakened to p which does not divide a2-1, see [CP2001 thm 3.3.4]) and then define
m = (a2p-1)/(a2-1).
m is divisible by (ap-1)/(a-1), so m is composite. Also this m is different for each choice of p, so we need only show m is an a-PRP to complete the proof.
Rewrite the expression for m above:
(a2-1)(m-1) = a(ap-1-1)(ap+a).
Clearly the rightmost term is even and a2-1 divides ap-1-1 (as p-1 is even). Also, Fermat's theorem tells us that ap-1-1 is divisible by p, so
2p(a2-1) divides (a2-1)(m-1)
or just 2p divides m-1. Finally, by the definition of m we have a2p = 1 + m(a2-1) or just a2p ≡ 1 (mod m). It follows that am-1 is also one modulo m, completing the proof. |
|